Orissa High Court

CONTC/987/2025 of DILLIP KUMAR SAHU Vs SURYAWANSHI MAYUR VIKAS,IAS on 30 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.987 of 2025 Dillip Kumar Sahu and others …. Petitioners Mr. J. K. Khuntia, Advocate -versus- Suryawanshi Mayur Vikas, IAS and another …. Opp. Parties Mr.S. Mishra, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 30.07.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.987 of 2025

Dillip Kumar Sahu and others ….

Petitioners

Mr. J. K. Khuntia, Advocate

-versus-

Suryawanshi Mayur Vikas,

IAS and another

….

Opp. Parties

Mr.S. Mishra, ASC

CORAM:

JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

30.07.2026 Hybrid Mode

03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. In the application non-compliance of the order dated 27.09.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No.21835 of 2024 is alleged.

3. Pursuant to the direction by order dated 09.04.2025, the learned Additional Standing Counsel has obtained instruction from the office of the Superintending Engineer (Roads & Buildings), Division-I, Baleshwer. In the said letter, it is indicated that as per the directions of the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Baleshwer, the petitioner- Sri Dillip Kumar Sahu was requested to attend the Court of Collector-cum-District Magistrate on 08.04.2026 vide letter dated 04.04.2026 by speed post. Thereafter, another request was made by office letter dated 02.05.2026. Both the letters were returned unserved with postal remarks, “no such addressee under the Dahapada village of Kantabania”.

Thereafter the said postal remarks and non-service of the letters were intimated to the Collector vide office letter dated 14.05.2026.

It is further stated in the letter by Superintending Engineer that the petitioner has been traced out and the next date of hearing shall be fixed before the Collector.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner undertakes to appear before the Collector on 17.08.2026.

5. On the said date, the Superintending Engineer shall also be intimated by the learned Additional Standing Counsel to remain present.

This order shall also be communicated to the Collector, Baleshwer by the learned Additional Standing Counsel to proceed in accordance with law.

6. The contempt petition is accordingly dropped.

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Judge

Gs/Radha Digitally Signed Signed by: GAGAN BIHARI SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 31-Jul-2026 18:50:13 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead