Orissa High Court
CMP/1577/2015 of GIRISH CHANDRA PATI Vs GOUR DAS on 29 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1577 of 2015 Girish Chandra Pati …. Petitioner Ms. Prajna Sarita Mohanty, Advocate on behalf of Mr. J. Pradhan, Advocate -versus- Gour Das & 11 Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Dwarika Prasad Mohanty, Advocate (for O.P. No.8) CORAM:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 1577 of 2015
Girish Chandra Pati
….
Petitioner
Ms. Prajna Sarita Mohanty, Advocate
on behalf of Mr. J. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
Gour Das & 11 Others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Dwarika Prasad Mohanty, Advocate
(for O.P. No.8)
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 29.07.2026
(Through Hybrid Mode)
15.
1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 17.08.2015 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balasore in C.S. No. 551 of 2013-I allowing the application under Section 10 of the CPC filed by defendants No. 10 for staying the suit.
2. Notice had been issued in this application on 03.02.2016, but no interim order had been passed.
3. On 22.07.2026, the matter has been adjourned on the prayer of learned counsel for the Petitioner to obtain instructions.
4. Today when the matter is taken up learned counsel for the Petitioner files a memo stating that she has no instructions from the Petitioner. The same is taken on record. She also submits that RSA No. 194 of 2004 is listed for hearing in this Court.
5. Considering the fact that while issuing notice, no interim order has been passed on that date or thereafter, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed.
6. In view of the disposal of the case, no order is required to be passed regarding substitution of Opposite Party No.10.
7. All pending interim applications stand disposed of.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 29-Jul-2026 19:44:10 Signature Not Verified