Orissa High Court
CMP/1074/2016 of GHARBASA MAHAKUR Vs MANGULU MOHAKUR on 29 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.1074 of 2016 Gharbasa Mahakur …. Petitioner Mr. Umesh Chandra Biswal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. H.S. Mishra, Advocate -versus- 1. Mangulu Mohakur 2. Sukadev Mohakur 3. Dinabandhu Mohakur 4. Haribandhu Mohakur 5. Kurupa Mohakur 6. Fula Patra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No.1074 of 2016
Gharbasa Mahakur
….
Petitioner
Mr. Umesh Chandra Biswal, Advocate
on behalf of Mr. H.S. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
1. Mangulu Mohakur
2. Sukadev Mohakur
3. Dinabandhu Mohakur
4. Haribandhu Mohakur
5. Kurupa Mohakur
6. Fula Patra
7. Hazar Bastia
8. Kunti Mohakur
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Trilochan Nanda, Advocate
(on behalf of O.P. No. 1 to 3)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
05. 29.07.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CMP has been filed by the Petitioner (Plaintiff) challenging the common order dated 18.03.20216 passed in Civil Suit No.54 of 2013 by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Balangir allowing the application of the defendant to file certain documents and rejecting the application filed by the plaintiff to recall order dated 06.01.2016 where prayer has been made to permit the plaintiff to adduce further evidence had been rejected.
2. Vide Order dated 08.08.2016 notice had been issued in the matter and further proceeding in Civil Suit No.54 of 2013 had been stayed.
3. Mr. Umesh Chandra Biswal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. H.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the meanwhile, the suit has been disposed of, so the CMP has been rendered infructuous.
4. Mr. Trilochan Nanda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Opposite Parties No.1 to 3 confirms the submission of Mr. Umesh Chandra Biswal, learned counsel.
5. In view of above submission, nothing remains to be decided in the CMP, which is therefore dismissed.
6. Misc. Case No. 1090 of 2016 stands disposed of.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Madhusmita Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 29-Jul-2026 19:45:20 Signature Not Verified