Orissa High Court
WP(C)/22113/2026 of M/S. DHARITRI TRADING AGENCY, BHADRAK Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI on 29 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.22113 OF 2026 M/s. Dharitri Trading Agency, Bhadrak and others …. Petitioners Mr. Siddharth Sahu, Advocate -versus- The Union Bank of India, Bhadrak and another …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.22113 OF 2026
M/s. Dharitri Trading Agency,
Bhadrak and others
….
Petitioners
Mr. Siddharth Sahu, Advocate
-versus-
The Union Bank of India, Bhadrak and
another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 29.07.2026
01.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Petitioners in this writ petition pray for the following relief:
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
(i) Admit the Writ Application
(ii) Call for the Records
(iii) Issue Rule NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the Documents sought for by the Petitioners in their letter dtd.15.07.2026under Annexure-7 Series by relying upon the order dtd.23.09.2024 passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.(C) No. 22681 of 2024 shall not be provided to them.
And if the Opposite Parties do not show cause or show insufficient cause then issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to provide all the Documents sought for by the Digitally Signed Signed by: SASHIKANT PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 30-Jul-2026 18:33:54 Signature Not Verified
Petitioners in their letter dtd.15.07.2026 under Annexure-7 Series.
And pass such other order/orders, direction/directions as may deem fit and proper.
And for this act of kindness the Petitioners as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
3. In course of argument, Mr. Sahu, learned counsel for the Petitioners prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to avail remedy in accordance with law.
4. In view of the above the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the Petitioners, if so advised, may work out remedy in accordance with law.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge Sashikant
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge