Orissa High Court
CMP/958/2016 of ABDUL MUNAFF Vs MOHAMMED SAMI on 28 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.958 of 2016 Abdul Munaff Petitioner Ms. Deepali Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- 1. Mohammed Sami 2. Mohammed Mahiuddin 3. Abdul Sami 4. Prasant Kumar Panda 5. Rosan Begam 6. Mohammed Mumtaj Alli 7. Mohammed Hayash …. Opp. Parties Mr. B.K.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No.958 of 2016
Abdul Munaff
Petitioner
Ms. Deepali Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
1. Mohammed Sami
2. Mohammed Mahiuddin
3. Abdul Sami
4. Prasant Kumar Panda
5. Rosan Begam
6. Mohammed Mumtaj Alli
7. Mohammed Hayash
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. B.K. Mohanty, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
04. 28.07.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This application has been filed challenging the order dated 13.05.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aska (Ganjam) in Civil Suit No.215/2015(CIS No.CS/0000434/2016), rejecting the application filed by the Defendant No.1 (Petitioner) under Order 14, Rule 2 of the CPC, to frame a preliminary issue.
2. On 29.06.2016, this Court had issued notice and stayed further proceeding in Civil Suit No. 215 of 2015. The matter is thereafter, listed today.
3. Memo is filed by Ms. Deepali Mohapatra, learned counsel for the Petitioner stating as follows:
“That the suit arising out of the present CMP is filed has become infructuous as suit already been withdrawn vide order dated 12.01.2022 copy enclosed.”
4. Although the memo is not clear but from perusal of the order dated 12.01.2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aska (Ganjam), which is enclosed with the memo, it is apparent that the suit has been permitted to be withdrawn.
5. In view of the withdrawal of the suit, nothing remains to be decided in the CMP, which is accordingly dismissed.
6. M.C. No.967 of 2016 stands disposed of.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Madhusmita Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 28-Jul-2026 20:32:46 Signature Not Verified