Orissa High Court

CMP/750/2017 of SUSIL KANTA ROUT Vs JYOTIRMAYEE ROUT@BALIARSINGH on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 750 of 2017 Susil Kanta Rout … Petitioner Mr. Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh, Advocate On behalf of Ms. Sujata Jena, Advocate -versus- Jyotirmayee Rout @ Baliarsingh and Others … Opp. Parties None (For O.P. No.3) CORAM: HON’BLE MISS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No. 750 of 2017

Susil Kanta Rout

…

Petitioner

Mr. Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh, Advocate

On behalf of Ms. Sujata Jena, Advocate

-versus-

Jyotirmayee Rout @ Baliarsingh and

Others

… Opp. Parties

None (For O.P. No.3)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No.

28.07.2026

08. (Through hybrid Mode)

1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 28.10.2016 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Puri in T.S. No. 82/244 of 2005/2000 (FD) (Annexure-2) rejecting the applications filed by the defendant no.2.

2. On 17.07.2017 while issuing notice, this Court had stayed further proceeding in the suit. When the matter was listed on 17.09.2019, in I.A. No. 1221 of 2018, this Court had modified the order dated 17.07.2017 directing that the final decree proceeding may continue, but the seal and sign shall be stayed till disposal of the petition.

3. Mr. Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Sujata Jena, learned counsel for the puspa Petitioner submits that in the meanwhile, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties for which the Petitioner wants to withdraw the CMP.

4. Although withdrawal memo has not been filed, but it is stated in the mention memo dated 27.07.2026 filed by Mr. Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh on behalf of Ms. Sujata Jena, learned counsel for the Petitioner which is at Flaf ‘K’ that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties for which the Petitioner wants to withdraw the CMP.

5. In view of the submission of the learned counsel and the mention memo, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the CMP pending, which is accordingly dismissed.

6. All interim applications stand disposed of.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 28-Jul-2026 19:01:34 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead