Orissa High Court
CMP/999/2016 of RANJIT KUMAR PARIJA Vs MANASI PARIJA on 28 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 999 of 2016 Ranjit Kumar Parija …. Petitioners Mr. Subrat Kumar Das, Advocate -versus- 1.Manasi Parija 2.Priyanka Parija …. Opp. Parties Ms. A . Ray, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. B.K. Ragada, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MISS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 999 of 2016
Ranjit Kumar Parija
….
Petitioners
Mr. Subrat Kumar Das, Advocate
-versus-
1.Manasi Parija
2.Priyanka Parija
….
Opp. Parties
Ms. A. Ray, learned counsel
on behalf of Mr. B.K. Ragada, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
08. 28.07.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 11.05.2016 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar in C.P. No. 481/2011 (Annexure-4), directing the Respondent to pay the educational expenses of his daughter-Opposite Party No.2(Petitioner No.2 in C.P. No. 481/2011).
2. While issuing notice on 25.07.2016, as an interim measure this Court had directed for stay of the order dated 11.05.2016 subject to the Petitioner depositing an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- before the learned Court below.
3. Mr. S. K. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the said amount was paid to the Opposite Party No.2 pursuant to order dated 01.11.2016 passed by this Court. He files a copy of the judgment dated 18.06.2024 passed in C.P. No. 380 of 2021 and submits that vide the said order, the marriage between the Petitioner and the Opposite Party No.1 has been dissolved by a decree of divorce. The copy of the judgment is taken on record.
4. In view of the above submission, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the CMP pending, which is disposed of.
5. Pending interim application, if any, stand disposed of.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Subhalaxmi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 30-Jul-2026 20:06:23 Signature Not Verified