Orissa High Court
WP(C)/18782/2026 of CHITTARANJAN SENAPATI Vs THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HOME LOAN CENTRE, BHUBANESWAR on 28 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18782 of 2026 Chittaranjan Senapati …. Petitioner Mr. Ramdas Achary, Advocate -versus- The Authorized Officer, State Bank of India, Home Loan Centre, Bhubaneswar …. Opp. Party Mr. G.D. Kar, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18782 of 2026
Chittaranjan Senapati
….
Petitioner
Mr. Ramdas Achary, Advocate
-versus-
The Authorized Officer, State
Bank of India, Home Loan
Centre, Bhubaneswar
….
Opp. Party
Mr. G.D. Kar, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.07.2026 Order No.
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. This writ application has been filed seeking for the following relief: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that Hon'ble Court graciously be pleased to:
Admit the Writ Petition; And Issue appropriate direction(s)/order(s) to the Opposite Party Bank to grant reasonable time for liquidation of the remaining outstanding dues in respect of the Reverse Mortgage Loan Account and to consider the petitioner's request for reduction/waiver of interest, penal interest and other charges in accordance with the applicable policies of the Bank in the interests of justice in the prevailing circumstances. And Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
3. Mr. Achary, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the meantime, the Petitioner has paid all the dues and the loan account of the Petitioner has already been closed.
4. Mr. Kar, learned counsel for the State Bank of India upon instruction also acknowledges the same.
5. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge Amit/Rajesh
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 29-Jul-2026 10:04:17 Signature Not Verified