Orissa High Court
WP(C)/18841/2026 of PIYUSH KUMAR SAHOO Vs AUTHORIZED OFFICER CUM CHIEF MANAGER, BANK OF BARODA,BHUBANESWAR on 28 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18841 of 2026 Piyush Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. Achyutananda Pattanaik, Advocate -versus- Authorized Officer -cum- Chief Manager, Bank of Baroda, Bhubaneswar …. Opp. Party Mr. K.M.H. Niamati, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18841 of 2026
Piyush Kumar Sahoo
….
Petitioner
Mr. Achyutananda Pattanaik, Advocate
-versus-
Authorized Officer -cum-
Chief Manager, Bank of
Baroda, Bhubaneswar
….
Opp. Party
Mr. K.M.H. Niamati, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.07.2026 Order No.
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. The petitioner in this writ application prays for the following relief: “In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:
(a) Admit the present Writ Petition;
(b) Issue notice to the Opposite Party and, after hearing the parties, be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned Possession Notice dated 02.06.2026, issued by the Opposite Party under Annexure-3 against the present petitioner (Borrower);
(c) Further direct the Opposite Party to permit the petitioner to regularize the loan account by paying the defaulted instalments towards his Cash Credit (CC) Loan and Term Loan outstanding dues within such time as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court; (d) Pass such other order(s) or direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray. And, may pass any other order/orders as may deem fit and proper; And, for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”
3. In course of hearing, Mr. Pattanaik, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to avail remedy under the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
4. Mr. Niamati, learned counsel appearing for the Bank of Baroda submits that he has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition, But, there should not be any impediment for the bank in proceeding with the auction sale of the secured asset.
5. In view of such submission, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with an observation that the petitioner, if so advised, may work out a remedy in accordance with law for redressal of his grievance. However, steps to be taken by the Petitioner should not stand on the way of the Bank in taking steps in accordance with law.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Amit/Rajesh
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 29-Jul-2026 10:04:17 Signature Not Verified