Orissa High Court
WP(C)/22741/2026 of SUDESH KUMAR GARABADU Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK THROUGH ITS CHIEF MANAGER, BHUBANESWAR on 27 July 2026
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) NO.22741 OF 2026 Sudesh Kumar Garabadu …. Petitioner Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, Sr. Advocate -versus- Punjab National Bank, Bhubaneswar and others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA HON’BLE MR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) NO.22741 OF 2026
Sudesh Kumar Garabadu
….
Petitioner
Mr. Dayananda Mohapatra, Sr. Advocate
-versus-
Punjab National Bank, Bhubaneswar
and others
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 27.07.2026
01. I.A. No.13737 of 2026
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. This is an application to substitute the correct copy of Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, prayer made in the I.A. is allowed. Consolidated writ petition substituting the copy of Annexure-1 is taken on record.
4. I.A. is disposed of.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
W.P.(C) No.22741 of 2026
2.
1. Petitioner in this writ application prays for the following relief:
“The petitioner therefore most humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition and further be pleased to issue notice to the opposite parties and after hearing both the parties be pleased to hold the properties under auction in Sl. No.4 of Annexure-1 is not covered under the provisions of Securitization Act 2002 and be pleased to quash notice of the auction in Annexure-1and in case auction held during pendency of the proceeding, so far the schedule property as referred to in Sl. No.4 of Annexure-1 is concerned and be pleased to restrain the bank/Opposite Party not to proceed against the petitioner and his father to recovery of the loan availed by the Opposite Party No.3.”
2. Mr. Biswal, learned counsel submits that he has instruction to appear on behalf of Punjab National Bank, ARMB, Bhubaneswar – Opposite party nos.1 and 2. He submits that the secured assets has already been put to auction on 24.07.2026.
3. In course of hearing, Mr. Mohapatra, learned Sr. Advocate appearing for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to work out remedy in accordance with law.
4. In view of such submissions, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with an observation that the petitioner if so advised may work out remedy raising issues available under law.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Gs/Radha Digitally Signed Signed by: GAGAN BIHARI SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 28-Jul-2026 15:53:59 Signature Not Verified