Orissa High Court

CMP/159/2016 of DEBENDRA KUMAR MOHANTY Vs JAGAT JYOTI MOHANTY on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 159 of 2016 1.Debendra Kumar Mohanty 2.Soumendra Kumar Mohanty 3.Dharmendra Kumar Mohanty 4. Renubala Mohanty …. Petitioners None -versus- 1.Jagat Jyoti Mohanty 2.Srikanta Mohanty 3.Charulata Pattnaik 4.Suvendra Mohanty 5.Bishnu Priya

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No. 159 of 2016

1.Debendra Kumar Mohanty

2.Soumendra Kumar Mohanty

3.Dharmendra Kumar Mohanty

4. Renubala Mohanty

….

Petitioners

None

-versus-

1.Jagat Jyoti Mohanty

2.Srikanta Mohanty

3.Charulata Pattnaik

4.Suvendra Mohanty

5.Bishnu Priya Mohanty

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. S. N. Das, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No.

05. 27.07.2026

(Through hybrid Mode)

1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 13.12.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khurda in Civil Suit No. 10 of 2013, rejecting the application of the Petitioners filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC, for rejection of the plaint.

2. On 23.07.2026, the matter had been listed, when no counsel had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.

3. Mr. B. P. Das, learned counsel on behalf of the Opposite Parties had submitted on 23.07.2026 that in view of the order dated 08.01.2016 passed in CMP No. 431 of 2014, this CMP has been rendered infructuous and this has also been mentioned in the order dated 29.07.2016.

4. In order to give one chance to learned counsel for the Petitioners, the matter had been adjourned to today.

5. None appears for the Petitioners, when the matter is called.

6. After perusing the order dated 08.01.2016 passed in CMP No. 431 of 2014, where the same order, i.e. order dated 13.12.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division in Civil Suit no. 10 of 2013 had been challenged and the order dated 29.07.2016 passed in this CMP, this CMP is disposed of as infructuous.

7. All pending interim applications stand disposed of.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Subhalaxmi

Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 27-Jul-2026 19:57:46 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead