Orissa High Court

WP(C)/21752/2026 of PRATAP KUMAR DAS Vs ODISHA GRAMEEN BANK, BHUBANESWAR on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) NO.21752 OF 2026 Pratap Kumar Das …. Petitioner Mr. S. Behera, Advocate -versus- Odisha Grameen Bank, Bhubaneswar and others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P. (C) NO.21752 OF 2026

Pratap Kumar Das

….

Petitioner

Mr. S. Behera, Advocate

-versus-

Odisha Grameen Bank, Bhubaneswar

and others

….

Opp. Parties

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 27.07.2026

01.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. The petitioner in this writ petition seeks for the following reliefs: “In the above circumstances, it is humbly prayed to this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue notice to the Opp. party as to why the case shall not be allowed and the Opp. parties shall not be directed for recalculate the loan amount in proper way by deducting the subside amount of Rs.1,05,000/- and total deposited amount of Rs.3,19,146/- of the petitioner by quashing the Annexure-1 for the interest of justice.”

3. It is submitted that notice U/s.13(2)of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) has already been issued against the petitioner.

4. In course of hearing, Mr. Behera, learned counsel for the petitioner by filing a memo prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to avail the remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Odisha,

Cuttack and/or to approach the Bank for settlement of the loan account.

5. Memo so filed is taken on record.

6. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with an observation that the petitioner may avail remedy in accordance with law.

(K.R. Mohapatra)

Judge

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Judge Radha Digitally Signed Signed by: RADHARANI JENA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 28-Jul-2026 15:38:15 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead