Orissa High Court

WPCRL/34/2026 of ASANTI NAHAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(Crl.) No.34 of 2026 Asanti Nahak …. Petitioner Mr. Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite parties Mr. Sanjay Rath, AGA CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(Crl.) No.34 of 2026

Asanti Nahak

….

Petitioner

Mr. Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and others

….

Opposite parties

Mr. Sanjay Rath, AGA

CORAM:

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

27.07.2026

05.

1. The mother of the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition in the nature of habeas corpus alleging that her minor daughter has been kidnapped, but despite the lodging of the F.I.R., no steps have been taken.

2. On several occasions, the directions were passed upon the police authorities to take action in this regard. It is submitted by learned Additional Government Advocate (AGA) representing the State-opposite parties that the minor daughter of the petitioner voluntarily appeared in the police station and gave her statement under Section 180 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) therein. Since she is a minor, she was produced before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC), Nayagarh and the direction was passed for her medical examination. The document produced by the learned AGA is taken on record.

3. It appears that she refused to undergo the medical examination. Her Statement under Section 183 of the BNSS was also recorded before the jurisdictional Magistrate. In both her statements, she stated that she voluntarily left the house and took shelter in the house of her aunt as the demand she made from her parents was not meted out. Subsequently, the CWC has given the custody of the minor daughter to the petitioner herself.

4. In view of the fact that the minor daughter of the petitioner has already been traced out and after undergoing the process of law, she is integrated into the family; there remains nothing in the instant writ petition. The same is hereby dismissed.

(Harish Tandon)

Chief Justice

(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge

M. Panda Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 28-Jul-2026 14:01:45 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead