Orissa High Court
WP(C)/21718/2026 of M/S PRIME SURVEILLANCE AGENCY PRIVATE LIMITED, MAYURBHANJ Vs M/S GUPTA POWER INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR on 27 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) NO.21718 OF 2026 M/s. Prime Surveillance Agency Private Limited, Mayurbhanj …. Petitioner Mr. Avijit Patnaik, Advocate -versus- M/s. Gupta Power Infrastructure Limited, Bhubaneswar and another …. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) NO.21718 OF 2026
M/s. Prime Surveillance Agency
Private Limited, Mayurbhanj
….
Petitioner
Mr. Avijit Patnaik, Advocate
-versus-
M/s. Gupta Power Infrastructure
Limited, Bhubaneswar and another
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 27.07.2026
02.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is with regard to inaction of the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) in accepting the claim of the petitioner under Annexure-2.
3. Taking note of the grievance of the petitioner, this Court vide order dated 22.07.2026 required Mr. Patnaik to appraise the Court about the status of IRP/RP (opposite party no.2) on the next date.
4. In response, Mr. Patnaik, learned counsel for the petitioner places on record the copy of order dated 26.09.2025 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench in Company Petition (IB) No.37/KB/2024, and para-7.2. (vi) of the said order reveals that Mr. Pradeep Kumar Kabra has been appointed as Interim Resolution Professional.
5. In course of hearing, Mr. Patnaik, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to work out remedy in accordance with law.
6. In view of such submission, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge Radha Digitally Signed Signed by: RADHARANI JENA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 28-Jul-2026 15:38:15 Signature Not Verified