Orissa High Court
CMP/1628/2015 of SUDHIR KUMAR BHUYAN Vs KADAMBINI BHUYAN on 24 July 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1628 of 2015 Sudhir Kumar Bhuyan …. Petitioner Mr. A . K. Panda, Advocate -versus- 1.Kadambini Bhuyan 2.Branch Manager, LIC Branch Office, Kendrapara 3.Divisional Manager LIC of India, Divisional Office, Cuttack 4. Saroj Kumar Bhuyan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 1628 of 2015
Sudhir Kumar Bhuyan
….
Petitioner
Mr. A. K. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
1.Kadambini Bhuyan
2.Branch Manager, LIC Branch
Office, Kendrapara
3.Divisional Manager LIC of India,
Divisional Office, Cuttack
4. Saroj Kumar Bhuyan
….
Opp. Parties
None (for O.P. No.1)
Ms. Sudhamayi Das, Advocate
on behalf of Mr. P. K. Mohanty, Advocate (for O.P. No. 2 and 3)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
05. 24.07.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 04.12.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division), 2nd Court, Cuttack in Intest Misc. Case No. 04 of 2010, granting a succession Certificate in favour of the Opposite Party No.1; and the order dated 18.11.2015 passed by the learned District Judge, Cuttack in FAO No. 128 of 2012 dismissing the Appeal.
2. Notice had been issued in this CMP on 04.10.2016, but no interim order had been passed.
3. Mr. A. K. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for an adjournment stating that the matter will be argued by Mr. A. C. Mohapatra, who is not available today as he has gone to Puri on occasion of Bahuda Yatra.
4. Ms. Sudhamayi Das, learned counsel is present on behalf of Mr. P. K. Mohanty, learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 2 and 3.
5. None appears for the Opposite Party No. 1.
6. Perusal of the impugned order dated 04.12.2012 reveals that the learned Civil Judge, (Senior Division), 2nd Court, Cuttack had held that the Opposite Party No.1 is entitled to the amount due on LIC policy bond no. 583477151 and the succession certificate had been issued in her favour allowing her to withdraw the whole of the amount.
7. In view of the order and since no interim order has been passed in this case, it can safely be presumed that in the meanwhile, the amount has been released in favour of the Opposite Party No.1.
8. Hence, this CMP is dismissed.
9. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner for revival of the CMP within a period of four weeks, in case the said amount has not been released.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Subhalaxmi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 24-Jul-2026 18:26:16 Signature Not Verified