Orissa High Court
CMP/806/2016 of DUKHISHYAM PANDA Vs BISHNU PRASAD PANDA on 24 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 806 of 2016 1.Dukhishyam Panda 2.Nalini Kumari Panda @ Nalini Panda … Petitioners None -versus- 1.Bishnu Prasad Panda 2.Siba Prasad Panda 3.Satya Prakash Panda 4.Rojalini Panda 5.Monalisha Panda 6.Laxmipriya Sahoo Opp. Parties Ms. Sonali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMP No. 806 of 2016
1.Dukhishyam Panda
2.Nalini Kumari Panda @ Nalini Panda
…
Petitioners
None
-versus-
1.Bishnu Prasad Panda
2.Siba Prasad Panda
3.Satya Prakash Panda
4.Rojalini Panda
5.Monalisha Panda
6.Laxmipriya Sahoo
Opp. Parties
Ms. Sonali Panigrahi, Advocate
on behalf of
Mr. Kalpataru Panigrahi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
24.07.2026
04. (Through hybrid Mode)
1. The CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 18.03.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khordha in C.S. No.368 of 2010 allowing the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 by the plaintiffs (petitioners) subject to payment of Rs.500/- as cost to the defendants.
2. None appears for the petitioners when matter is called.
3. While issuing notice on 19.07.2016, further proceedings in C.S. No. 368 of 2010 pending before the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khordha, had been stayed by this Court. Thereafter, the matter has not been listed before this Court. As nearly ten years have elapsed since then,
Utkalika and no counsel appears on behalf of the petitioners, it can safely be presumed that the said civil suit has, in the meantime, been disposed of.
4. The CMP is, therefore dismissed.
5. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner for revival of the CMP within four weeks, in case any cause of action still survives.
3. (Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Jul-2026 18:06:34 Signature Not Verified