Orissa High Court

CMP/1106/2016 of BHUBANA KAMPA Vs PURNA CH.KAMPA on 24 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1106 of 2016 Bhubana Kampa …. Petitioner Mr. Kousik Ananda Guru, Advocate -versus- Purna Chandra Kampa & 30 Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Prasanta Ku. Nayak, Advocate CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No. 1106 of 2016

Bhubana Kampa

….

Petitioner

Mr. Kousik Ananda Guru, Advocate

-versus-

Purna Chandra Kampa & 30 Others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Prasanta Ku. Nayak, Advocate

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 24.07.2026

(Through Hybrid Mode)

05.

1. This CMP has been filed challenging the order dated 19.07.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Boudh in C.S. No. 113 of 2015, rejecting the application of the plaintiff filed under Order 26 Rule 4A of the CPC for issue of a commission for examination of a witness in the suit.

2. While issuing notice on 08.08.2016, further proceeding in C.S. No. 113 of 2015 pending before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Boudh had been stayed.

3. Learned counsel for the Parties submits that they do not have up-to-date instructions regarding present status of the suit.

4. Mr. Prasanta Ku. Nayak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Parties No. 2 and 17 after checking the status of the suit in the e-Court Website submits that Civil Suit No. 113 of 2015 has been dismissed for default on 10.01.2022.

5. In view of this development, no useful purpose will be served by adjourning the case for obtaining instructions.

6. The CMP is therefore dismissed.

7. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner for revival of the suit within a period of four weeks, in case cause of action still survives.

8. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 24-Jul-2026 18:36:59 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead