Orissa High Court

WP(C)/7292/2026 of SHIV KUMAR SAHOO Vs ODISHA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, CUTTACK on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.7292 of 2026 Shiv Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. Sourav Das, Advocate -versus- Odisha Public Service Commission and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. Arnav Behera, Advocate CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WP(C) No.7292 of 2026

Shiv Kumar Sahoo

….

Petitioner

Mr. Sourav Das, Advocate

-versus-

Odisha Public Service Commission

and another

….

Opposite Parties

Mr. Arnav Behera, Advocate

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

23.07.2026

01.

1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition invoking provisions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer(s):- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to admit the present writ application/ petition, issue notice to the opposite parties and after hearing both the parties be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ/writs and quash the Opposite Party No.02’s letter & RTI Reply dtd.12.02.2026 and in-consequence thereof, direct the Opposite Party No.02 to submit the information as well as the documents of the desired information as per the Petitioner’s RTI Application on dtd.23.11.2022; And may pass any other appropriate writ/writs and order/orders which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper; And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

2. Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, by way of filing a memo in Court today, submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition. The said memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.

(M.S. Raman) Judge Laxmikant Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Jul-2026 19:05:31 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead