Orissa High Court

WP(C)/9806/2026 of PARTHA MAHALIK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9806 OF 2026 Partha Mahalik …. Petitioner Mr. Debabrata Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Subha Bikash Panda, Additional Government Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.9806 OF 2026

Partha Mahalik

….

Petitioner

Mr. Debabrata Das, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and others

…. Opp. Parties

Mr. Subha Bikash Panda,

Additional Government Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE KRUSHNA RAM MOHAPATRA

JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 23.07.2026

01.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioner in this writ petition prays for the following relief:

“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ Petition and issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the letter dated 06.02.2026 (Annexure-4) shall not be quashed and Petitioner should not be allowed to appear in the First Semester Examination (Regular), 2025 of Bachelor of Semester Examination (Regular), 2025 of Bachelor of Computer Application Course conducted by the O.P. no.3 under O.P. no.2;

And if the Opp. Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient or false cause, be pleased to make the said rule absolute;

And may further be pleased to pass any other order(s) as deemed fit and proper;

And for this act of kindness the Petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

3. It is submitted by Mr. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner that in the meantime, some developments have taken Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Jul-2026 18:31:09 Signature Not Verified place. Hence, he prays for withdrawal of the writ petition seeking liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. A memo in support of his submission is filed before this Court, which is taken on record.

4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the Petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars within a period of one month hence.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(K.R. Mohapatra)

Judge

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Judge ms Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 23-Jul-2026 18:31:09 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead