Orissa High Court
WP(C)/6698/2026 of RAMA CHANDRA BEHERA @ SIBANANDA SWAIN @ BEHERA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 21 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6698 OF 2026 Rama Chandra Behera @ Sibananda Swain @ Behera …. Petitioner Mr. Saroj Kumar Dash, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mrs. Jyoshnamayee Sahoo, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.6698 OF 2026
Rama Chandra Behera @ Sibananda
Swain @ Behera
….
Petitioner
Mr. Saroj Kumar Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opp. Parties
Mrs. Jyoshnamayee Sahoo,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 21.07.2026
04.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Petitioner in this writ petition prays for the following relief;
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court my graciously be pleased to admit this Writ petition, issue notice to the Opp. Parties and after hearing the parties direction may kindly be issued to the MCL to provide employment to the petitioner under Rehabilitation Scheme as the petitioner is a land oustee in view of the recommendation of the Screening Committee in the interest of justice.
And to issue any other writ or writs, direction or directions, order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper.
And for which act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
Digitally Signed Signed by: SASHIKANT PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 21-Jul-2026 18:54:15 Signature Not Verified
3. I.A. No.6796 of 2026 has been filed for amendment of the writ petition.
4. In course of hearing of the I.A., Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that interest of justice would be best served if the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with a liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars including the amendment, sought to be incorporated. A memo is also filed in support of his submission, which is taken on record.
5. Mrs. Sahoo, learned Additional Standing Counsel does not have any objection to such prayer.
6. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars within a period of one month hence.
7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge Sashikant