Orissa High Court
RPFAM/368/2022 of PITABAS BARIK Vs BAIJAYANTI BARIK on 21 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.368 of 2022 Pitabas Barik …. Petitioner None -versus- Baijayanti Bark …. Opp. Party Ms. S. Mishra, Advocate on behalf of Mr. A . Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 21.07.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.368 of 2022
Pitabas Barik
….
Petitioner
None
-versus-
Baijayanti Bark
….
Opp. Party
Ms. S. Mishra, Advocate
on behalf of
Mr. A. Mishra,
Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
No.
ORDER
21.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
06.
1. The matter is listed for ‘Orders’ remaining defective since the date it was filed on 31.12.2022.
2. Since the certified copy of the impugned order has not been filed, stamp reporting could not be made at the Registry as per the Rules of this Court.
Opportunity was given to the petitioner by the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), Lawzima granting three weeks’ time by order dated 28.10.2025 for removal of defects. Then on 19.03.2026 the matter was listed before this Court and further time of fifteen working days was granted. Again the matter was listed on 06.04.2026, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 28-Jul-2026 17:48:31 Signature Not Verified amit directed to be listed to grant further opportunity. Again further opportunity was granted by orders dated 04.05.2026 and 18.05.2026. All the above adjournments has yielded no results. The petitioner remains non- compliant.
3. Apparently the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter as it is kept defective for the last three and half years.
4. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 28-Jul-2026 17:48:31 Signature Not Verified