Orissa High Court

CRLMC/2233/2022 of SURESH CHANDRA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 20 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 2233 of 2022 1. Suresh Chandra Sahoo 2. Jayashree Sahoo …. Petitioners Ms. Trupti Sharma, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Devashis Panda, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Bharat Sethi …. Opp. Parties Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMC No. 2233 of 2022

1. Suresh Chandra Sahoo

2. Jayashree Sahoo

….

Petitioners

Ms. Trupti Sharma, Advocate,

on behalf of Mr. Devashis Panda, Advocate

-versus-

1. State of Odisha

2. Bharat Sethi

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout,

Additional Standing Counsel

(for O.P. No.1)

Mr. M.B. Das, Advocate

(for O.P. No.2)

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 20.07.2026

(Through Hybrid Mode)

07.

1. This CRLMC has been filed for quashing the FIR and consequential investigation in Airfield P.S. Case No. 294 of 2021.

2. Ms. Trupti Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Devashis Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the CRLMC has become infructuous as in the meanwhile investigation has been completed and charge sheet has been submitted in Airfield P.S. Case No. 294 of 2021. She files a memo signed by Mr. Devashis Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioners, where it is stated that the petition has become infructuous with filing of charge sheet and it may be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order of cognizance.

3. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the memo, the CRLMC is dismissed as infructuous.

4. It is open to the Petitioners to avail of any remedy which is available to them under law.

5. It is made clear that this Court had not gone into the merits of the case of the Petitioners.

6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 20-Jul-2026 20:25:37 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead