Orissa High Court
RPFAM/245/2022 of AMAR KUMAR ROUT Vs MONALISHA ROUT on 20 July 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.245 of 2022 Amar Kumar Rout …. Petitioner Mr. G. Muduli, Advocate -versus- Monalisha Rout and another …. Opposite Parties Ms. Ritupurna Chaterjee, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Prasad Bose, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.245 of 2022
Amar Kumar Rout
….
Petitioner
Mr. G. Muduli, Advocate
-versus-
Monalisha Rout and
another
…. Opposite Parties
Ms. Ritupurna Chaterjee, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amit Prasad Bose, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
20.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
04.
1. The matter was presented on 30.09.2022 and defects were directed to be removed by the Deputy Registrar (J), Lawzima by order dated 21.11.2025.
2. On 01.05.2026 the following order was passed: “1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the opposite party that he has not been served with copy of the petition.
2. The defect pointed by the S.R. shall be removed within two weeks.
3. If defects are removed, the matter shall be listed for ‘Fresh Admission’ in the week commencing 29.06.2026. Copy of this order shall be intimated to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the Registry. Learned counsel for the petitioner shall serve copy of the petition on Ms. Sahu, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
Thereafter, on 02.07.2026, the following order was passed:
“2. By order dated 01.05.2026, copy of the order was directed to be intimated to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the Registry. Apparently, since 2022 no steps have been taken.
3. To grant further opportunity to the petitioner, the matter shall be listed on 20.07.2026 indicating that the matter shall be disposed of.
Copy of this order and order dated 01.05.2026 shall be communicated to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the Registry.”
3. Today, the matter being listed under the heading for orders, memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner which states thus:
“That learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has no instruction in the matter, hence appropriate order may kindly be passed in this case.” (sic)
The memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated.
4. Apparently, after filing of the case the petitioner is not prosecuting the matter and sufficient indulgence has been shown by this Court. As directed by earlier order dated 02.07.2026 it is indicated in the cause list “the matter shall be disposed of”.
5. In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of.
Copy of this order shall be forwarded by the Registry to the learned Judge, Family Court, Dhenkanal to be kept in the records of Cr.P. No.1 of 2021 disposed of by judgment dated 28.01.2022.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge jyotsna
Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOSTNARANI MAJHEE Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 24-Jul-2026 15:43:15 Signature Not Verified