Orissa High Court
CRLMP/870/2026 of PENTAGRAM PROPERTIES LLP, BHUBANESWAR Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 20 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 870 of 2026 Pentagram Properties LLP, Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner Mr. Lingaraj Sarangi, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bhubaneswar 3. Inspector-in-Charge, Nayapalli Police Station, Nayapalli,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 870 of 2026
Pentagram Properties LLP,
Bhubaneswar
….
Petitioner
Mr. Lingaraj Sarangi, Advocate
-versus-
1. State of Odisha
2. Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Bhubaneswar
3. Inspector-in-Charge, Nayapalli
Police Station, Nayapalli,
Bhubaneswar
4. Sanjay Goswami
5. Propguruz Realty India LLP
6. Mrs. Minati Goswami
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. S.J. Mohanty, ASC
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
02. 20.07.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CRLMP has been filed for a direction to the Opposite Party No.3 to register the FIR dated 01.06.2026 (Annexure-2).
2. On 17.07.2026, after going through the averments in the CRLMP, I was not satisfied that any case was made out for issuing any direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to the Opposite Party No.3 to register any FIR. But the matter was adjourned to today on prayer of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, that the case would be conducted by Mr. Lingaraj Sarangi, learned counsel.
3. Mr. L. Sarangi, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the CRLMP and avail the alternative remedy which is available to him, for non- registration of FIR by the Police.
4. Considering the said submission, the CRLMP is disposed of as withdrawn.
5. It is not necessary to grant any liberty to the Petitioner to avail the alternative remedy as it is available to him under the BNSS.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
puspa
Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 20-Jul-2026 19:22:21 Signature Not Verified