Orissa High Court

CRLMP/856/2026 of SAKUNTALA TRIPATHY Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 856 of 2026 Sakuntala Tripathy … Petitioner None -versus- 1. State of Odisha, represented through its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Home, Lokaseva Bhawan Bhubaneswar, District-Khordha 2. Superintendent of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No. 856 of 2026

Sakuntala Tripathy

…

Petitioner

None

-versus-

1. State of Odisha, represented through

its Principal Secretary to Government,

Department of Home, Lokaseva Bhawan

Bhubaneswar, District-Khordha

2. Superintendent of Police, Bhadrak

3. Inspector in Charge (IIC), Bhadrak

Rural Police Station, Bhadrak

…

Opp. Parties

Mr. A.K. Apat, AGA

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No.

17.07.2026

01. (Through hybrid Mode)

1. None appeared at the time of first call for which the matter had been passed over. When the matter is called again, none appears on behalf of the Petitioner.

2. This CRLMP has been filed for issue of a direction to the Opposite Party No.3 to register the complaint sent by the Petitioner through Speed Post on 20.04.2024 and investigate into the same.

3. It has been stated in the petition that on basis of the complaint of the Petitioner dated 20.04.2024 submitted to the puspa IIC, Bhadrak Rural Police Station, no case was registered. So after two years the Petitioner has submitted a grievance before the S.P., Bhadrak on 25.05.2026 by Speed Post. Thereafter, she approached this Court as no case was registered.

4. Considering the fact that the Petitioner has approached the S.P. two years after the alleged submission of the FIR to the IIC, Bhadrak Rural Police Station, I do not consider this to be a fit case to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and issue a direction to the Opposite Party No.3 to register any case on the basis of the FIR dated 20.04.2024.

5. The CRLMP is accordingly dismissed.

6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 17-Jul-2026 18:30:03 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead