Orissa High Court

CRLMP/874/2026 of SUCHITRA NAIK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 874 of 2026 Suchitra Naik …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate -versus- 1) State of Odisha 2) The Superintendent of Police, Cuttack 3) The Inspector-in-charge, Badamba Police Station, Cuttack …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.K. Rout,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No. 874 of 2026

Suchitra Naik

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.K. Nayak, Advocate

-versus-

1) State of Odisha

2) The Superintendent of Police,

Cuttack

3) The Inspector-in-charge,

Badamba Police Station, Cuttack

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. S.K. Rout,

Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No.

01. 17.07.2026

(Through hybrid Mode)

1. None appeared for the Petitioner in the first hour when the matter is called, for which the matter was passed over.

2. When the matter is called again, none appears on behalf of the Petitioner.

3. This CRLMP has been filed for a direction to the Opp. Parties to conduct free and fair investigation by adding offence under Sections 109 and 74 of the BNS.

4. It has been averred in the CRLMP that the accused persons had entered her house (all women) and abused her in obscene language, assaulted her by means of fist and kicks and dragged her hair. When her mother protested, one Kasinath

Naik assaulted her mother by means of fist blows and kicks and when she protested all of them threatened to kill them. Although offence under Sections 74 and 109 of the BNS was made out but the offences were deliberately left out, while registering the FIR.

5. Perusal of Annexure-1 reveals that Badamba PS Case No. 238 of 2026 has been registered on 23.06.2026 under Sections 296, 115(2), 351(3) and Section 3(5) of the BNS against Mamata Naik, Padmini Naik, Jayanti Naik and Kasinath Naik.

6. Not even one month has elapsed since date of registration of the case. Hence investigation in the case must be in progress.

7. It is the duty of the IO to investigate the case according to law and to submit final form on the basis of the statements of witnesses and other materials collected during investigation.

8. It is therefore directed that if investigation reveals that the offences under Sections 109 and 74 of the BNS along with any other offences are made out, the Opp. Party No.3 shall ensure that final form is submitted basing on these materials.

9. This CRLMP is disposed of with the aforesaid directions.

10. Copy of this order be communicated to the Opp. Party No.3-IIC, Badamba Police Station by the Registry forthwith.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Madhusmita Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 17-Jul-2026 20:25:59 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead