Orissa High Court
RPFAM/13/2022 of P.PRAVAKAR PATRO Vs P.DILESWARI PATRO on 17 July 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.13 of 2022 P. Pravakar Patro …. Petitioner Mr. A . Das, Advocate -versus- P. Dileswari Patro & Others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 17.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 04. 1. The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.13 of 2022
P. Pravakar Patro
….
Petitioner
Mr. A. Das, Advocate
-versus-
P. Dileswari Patro & Others
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
No.
ORDER
17.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
04.
1. The petition was presented before this Court on 25.01.2022. Stamp reporting was done on 07.02.2022 indicating that steps for limitation not taken. Since then no steps have been taken till the matter is listed.
The matter was listed on 01.05.2026 before the learned Deputy Registrar (J), Lawzima and one week time was granted to remove the defects. Thereafter on 11.05.2026 the matter was placed for further stamp reporting.
2. Hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner the following order was passed on 14.05.2026: “1. The matter was presented before this Court on 25.01.2022 and for the last more than four years and four months nothing has happened regarding the matter to be prosecuted by the Petitioner.
The matter remained defective. On 01.05.2026 defects were directed to be removed when the matter was listed before the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), Lawzima.
On 11.05.2026 the matter was listed before this Court as stamp reporting was not done, stamp reporting was directed to be done. The Stamp Report points that there is a delay of seven days. I.A. has not been filed seeking condonation of delay.
2. The matter being in the list for ‘Fresh Admission’ is mentioned by the learned counsel for the Petitioner at the beginning of the day’s proceeding seeking adjournment.
3. To grant further opportunity to the Petitioner, the matter shall be listed in the week commencing 13th July, 2026.
4. Copy of this order shall be forwarded by the Registry to the learned Judge, Family Court, Berhampur, Ganjam to be kept in the records of Criminal Proceeding No.331 of disposed of by judgment dated 11.10.2021.”
3. The matter being listed and taken up for ‘Fresh Admission’ memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner which states thus:
“The petitioner does not want to prosecute the aforesaid RPFAM. Hence the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the same.”
Memo shall be kept on record. Scanned copy be updated.
4. The petition stands disposed of.
Copy of this order shall be forwarded by the Registry to the learned Judge, Family Court, amit Berhampur, Ganjam to be kept in the records of Criminal Proceeding No.331 of 2018 disposed of by judgment dated 11.10.2021.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge