Orissa High Court
CONTC/1750/2026 of REGIONAL TRUCK OWNER WELFARE ASSOCIATION, ANGUL Vs MAYADHAR BEHERA, SUB COLLECTOR,ANGUL on 17 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.1750 of 2026 Regional Truck Owner Welfare Association, Angul …. Petitioner Mr. G.K. Mohanty, Advocate -Versus- Mayadhar Behera, Sub-Collector, Angul …. Opposite Party Mrs. Suman Pattanayak, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.1750 of 2026
Regional Truck Owner Welfare
Association, Angul
….
Petitioner
Mr. G.K. Mohanty, Advocate
-Versus-
Mayadhar Behera, Sub-Collector,
Angul
….
Opposite Party
Mrs. Suman Pattanayak, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
Order No.
01.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.07.2026
This complaint alleges non-compliance of the order dated 22.08.2025 entered in complainant’s WP(C) No.22986 of 2025.
At the stage of admission, learned AGA Ms. Pattanayak has produced the subject order. In the last paragraph, the Sub-Collector, Angul, who happens to be the contemnor herein has stated as under: “In the above context, a meeting was re-convened by the Sub- Collector, Angul on dtd. 09.4.2026 and in the said meeting it was decided that both truck owners' associations will jointly sit together and arrive at an amicable settlement for the loading and transportation of ash from Nalco with maintaining peace and discipline. If required, the work will be carried out under the supervision of Nalco authorities and the Nalco Police Station officials, ensuring the maintenance of law and order. The copy of the said proceeding is annexed as "ANNEXURE-D".”
Learned counsel appearing for the complainant vehemently argues that there is no due compliance and therefore, the proceedings should be kept on and that the contemnors be tried. We do not agree with this, inasmuch as, the Contempt Court cannot undertake a critical examination of the compliance.
In the above circumstances, the proceedings are dropped with liberty to the complainant to agitate the leftover grievances elsewhere in accordance with law and in that connection all contentions are kept open.
Web copy of this order to be acted upon by all concerned.
(Krishna S. Dixit) Judge
Prasant Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 17-Jul-2026 16:25:38 Signature Not Verified