Orissa High Court

WP(C)/11341/2025 of ARTATRANA MISHRA Vs CERTIFICATE OFFICER CUM SUB COLLECTOR, BARGARH on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.11341 of 2025 Artatrana Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. Dolagobinda Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- Certificate Officer-cum-Sub- Collector, Bargarh & others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.11341 of 2025

Artatrana Mishra

….

Petitioner

Mr. Dolagobinda Mohapatra, Advocate

-versus-

Certificate Officer-cum-Sub-

Collector, Bargarh & others

….

Opp. Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

Order No.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

17.07.2026 Hybrid Mode

04. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition discloses the following:

“The subject matter out of which the present W.P.(C) arises was never before this Hon’ble Court in any form whatsoever as per Instruction of the petitioner.”

2. In paragraph-5 of the petition it has been mentioned that W.P. (C) No.1259 of 2011 filed earlier by the petitioner (who was stated to be a disabled person) challenging the stoppage of ‘Madhubabu Pension’ granted by the State in a scheme. It has been further stated that by interim order dated 04.05.2011 ‘the pension was restored’.

It is further submitted though not stated in the petition, the writ petition was thereafter dismissed for default. The Diary CMAPL No.14245 of 2025 has been filed for restoration of the writ petition which is pending consideration by this Court. In the present writ petition the P.R. No.14 dated

27.02.2025 issued by the OPDR authority seeking recovery ₹21,600/- has been challenged.

3. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner on 12.05.2025 notices were issued to the opposite parties.

Today the matter being listed for orders is mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Memo of date is filed which states thus:

“That, during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has deposited the entire amount in Certificate Case No.14/2024.

That in view of the aforesaid deposit, the grievance raised in present writ petition no longer survive.

Hence the petitioner want to withdraw aforesaid writ petition.” (sic)

4. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)

Judge

Gs Digitally Signed Signed by: GAGAN BIHARI SAMAL Reason: Authentication Location: ohc Date: 22-Jul-2026 15:43:17 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead