Orissa High Court

CRLMP/858/2026 of DILLIP KUMAR KARMI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 17 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 858 of 2026 Dillip Kumar Karmi …. Petitioner Mr. M. Pagal, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha Represented through Secretary Home Department, Bhubaneswar 2. Director General of Police, Cuttack 3. Superintendent of Police, Sonepur 4.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No. 858 of 2026

Dillip Kumar Karmi

….

Petitioner

Mr. M. Pagal, Advocate

-versus-

1. State of Odisha Represented through

Secretary

Home

Department,

Bhubaneswar

2. Director General of Police, Cuttack

3. Superintendent of Police, Sonepur

4.

Inspector-In-charge,

Subalaya

Police Station

5. Raghunath Mahakur

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout,

Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 17.07.2026

(Through Hybrid Mode)

01.

1. This CRLMP has been filed for a direction to Opposite Party No.4 to register the complaint of the Petitioner dated 27.05.2026 as an FIR and register a case and investigate into the allegations in the FIR.

2. Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout, learned Additional Standing Counsel produces the instructions dated 16.07.2026 of the Inspector Subalaya Police Station, who has sent the instructions along with copy of the case records in Subalaya P.S. Case No. 133 of 2026.

3. Instead of stating that Subalaya P.S. Case No. 133 of 2026 has been registered on the complaint submitted by the Petitioner, the Inspector, Subalaya Police Station has sent instructions along with the copy of the FIR.

4. Copy of the FIR annexed to the instructions reveal that Subalaya P.S. Case No. 133 dated 15.07.2026 has been registered against Raghunath Mahakur under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 296, 118(2), 351(2) of BNS.

5. As a case has been registered on the basis of the complaint of the Petitioner, it is not necessary to keep this CRLMP pending or issue any direction to the Opposite Parties.

6. The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of.

7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 17-Jul-2026 18:43:56 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead