Orissa High Court
WP(C)/15438/2026 of M/S SUDHARMA INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED, VISHAKHAPATNAM Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 15 July 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 15438 of 2026 M/s. Sudharma Infratech Private Limited, Andhra Pradesh …. Petitioner Mr. Sameer Kumar Singh, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Debashis Tripathy, Additional Government Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 15438 of 2026
M/s. Sudharma Infratech Private
Limited, Andhra Pradesh
….
Petitioner
Mr. Sameer Kumar Singh, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. Debashis Tripathy, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.07.2026
I.A. No.9900 of 2026 & W.P.(C) No.15438 of 2026
01.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for grant of the following prayer(s):
“In the light of the facts and circumstances stated hereinabove, it is therefore most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to;
I. Admit the present writ petition;
II. Issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the action of proceeding toward issuance of Letter of Acceptance in favour of Opposite Party No.4 shall not be declared illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Clause- 2.20.7 of the Request for Proposal;
III. Issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why bidders found non- compliant with the mandatory Bid Security requirements under Clause 1.2.4 of the Request for Proposal, including furnishing Bank Guarantee otherwise than through a Nationalized Bank, shall not be declared non-responsive and disqualified;
IV. Issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why all eligible bidders falling within the 14.99% bracket under Clause- 2.20.7 shall not be relegated to the transparent lottery mechanism prescribed under the tender conditions;
V. And if the Opp. Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, then the said Rule be made ABSOLUTE;
VI. And any other order(s)/direction(s) be passed as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and fair play.
And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall, as in duty bound ever pray.”
2. The afore-noted Interlocutory Application is taken out by the applicant/petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the instant writ petition.
3. Perused the application.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the averments made in the application, the same is hereby allowed. The petitioner is thus permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the I.A. and the writ petition stand disposed of.
(Harish Tandon)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
S. Behera Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 22-Jul-2026 12:23:00 Signature Not Verified