Orissa High Court

CRLMP/410/2022 of PRASANNJIT NAYAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 15 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 410 of 2022 Prasannjit Nayak … Petitioner Mr. Sidhartha Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others … Opp. Parties Mr. Amitabh Pradhan, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER Order No. 15.07.2026 11.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No. 410 of 2022

Prasannjit Nayak

…

Petitioner

Mr. Sidhartha Das, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha and Others

… Opp. Parties

Mr. Amitabh Pradhan, ASC

CORAM:

HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No.

15.07.2026

11. (Through hybrid Mode)

1. This CRLMP has been filed to quash the FIR/Criminal Proceeding vide Jakhapura P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022 corresponding to C.T. Case No. 102 of 2022 pending in the Court of the learned JMFC, Jajpur Road.

2. On 04.04.2022, while directing the learned State Counsel to obtain instructions in I.A. No. 59 of 2022, a coordinate Bench of this Court had directed that no coercive action should be taken against the Petitioner till the next date of listing. Thereafter, the matter has been adjourned on 18.04.2022, 06.09.2024, 28.10.2024, 13.11.2024, 04.12.2024, 30.06.2026, 07.07.2026 and 10.07.2026.

3. On 10.07.2026, learned State Counsel had been directed puspa to obtain instructions regarding present status of investigation as well as the up-to-date case diary in Jakhapura P.S. Case No. 06 of 2022.

4. Pursuant to the said order, instructions dated 14.07.2026 of the IIC, Jakhapura P.S. are produced by Mr. Amitabh Pradhan, learned Additional Standing Counsel where it is stated that after completion of investigation, Final Form as Chargesheet No. 142 dated 31.12.2022 has been submitted against the Petitioner under Section 379 of IPC and Section 21 of the MMDR Act.

5. In view of the said development, the CRLMP is disposed of as infructuous.

6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case of the Petitioner.

7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 15-Jul-2026 18:54:41 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead