Orissa High Court
WP(C)/19239/2026 of P.LEELA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 15 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 19239 of 2026 P. Leela and another …. Petitioners Mr. J.S. Maharana, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Debashis Tripathy, Additional Government Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 19239 of 2026
P. Leela and another
….
Petitioners
Mr. J.S. Maharana, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. Debashis Tripathy, Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
15.07.2026
01.
1. The instant writ petition is taken out by the petitioners with the following prayer:
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this PIL writ petition, issue Rule NISI calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause, and if the Opp. Parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, the said rule be made absolute in granting the reliefs prayed for;
i). Direct the OP No.3, Collector, Khordha for relocation of Khordha CL Shop to any place other than the proposed place, Plot No.457/5831/6175 pertaining to Khata No.648/3005, Talasahi, Ward
No.20 of Khordha Municipality, since the area in question is within the parameter of restrictive zones vis-à-vis distances stipulated under the prevailing Rule-26 of the Odisha Excise Rules, 2017.
And pass any other orders/order as deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
And for this act of kindness, the petitioners are in duty bound shall remain ever pray.”
2. Mr. J.S. Maharana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners files a memo in the Court today stating therein that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the case and seek leave of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition. The said memo is taken on record.
3. Leave is granted.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Harish Tandon)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
S. Behera Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-Jul-2026 17:40:12 Signature Not Verified