Orissa High Court
WP(C)/20589/2026 of SRI SATABHAUNI THAKURANI, BHADRAK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 13 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.20589 of 2026 Sri Satabhauni Thakurani, Bhadrak & Others …. Petitioners Mr. S.P. Mishra, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. G.N. Parida, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Ms. Jyoshnamayee Sahoo, ASC Ms.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.20589 of 2026
Sri Satabhauni Thakurani,
Bhadrak & Others
….
Petitioners
Mr. S.P. Mishra, Sr. Advocate
along with
Mr. G.N. Parida, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
….
Opp. Parties
Ms. Jyoshnamayee Sahoo, ASC
Ms. Pratysha Naidu, Advocate
for Commissioner of Endowments
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.07.2026
01.
1. This matter is taken up through Virtual Mode.
2. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioners pray for following reliefs:
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that before this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue rule nisi calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other applicable writs shall not be issued and the impugned Order dt. 21.05.2026 passed by the Addl Asst Commissioner of Endowments, Cuttack vide Annexure - 7 shall not be quashed and direct the Opposite Parties not to give effect to the Non-Hereditary Trust Board constituted pursuant to the impugned order:
And in the event, the Opposite Parties fail to
Amit/Rajesh show cause or show insufficient cause the said rule be made absolute and the impugned Order dt. 21.05.2026 passed by the Addl Asst Commissioner of Endowments, Cuttack vide Annexure - 7 be quashed and pass such further direction as may be necessary for restoration of the hereditary management.”
3. In course of hearing on Admission, Mr. Mishra, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioners submits that the Writ Petition requires an exhaustive amendment. Hence, he prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition seeking livery to file fresh one with better particulars.
4. Ms. Naidu, learned counsel appearing for the Commissioner of Endowments does not have any objection to any prayer.
5. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioners to file a fresh one with better particulars within a period of one month hence.
6. Certified copy of the document, if any, filed be returned to the learned counsel for the Petitioners forthwith on substitution of attested photocopy thereof.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 14-Jul-2026 10:18:17 Signature Not Verified