Orissa High Court
CRLMP/828/2026 of BIDYUT PRAVA MALLICK Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 828 of 2026 Bidyutprava Mallick …. Petitioner Mr. Pritam Kumar Mohanty, Adovate and Mr. R.R. Das, Advocate -versus- 1) State of Odisha 2) Director General of Police, Cuttack 3) Deputy Commissioner of Police, Bhubaneswar 4)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 828 of 2026
Bidyutprava Mallick
….
Petitioner
Mr. Pritam Kumar Mohanty, Adovate
and Mr. R.R. Das, Advocate
-versus-
1) State of Odisha
2) Director General of Police,
Cuttack
3) Deputy Commissioner of Police,
Bhubaneswar
4) Inspector-in-Charge,
Nandankanan P.S., Khorda
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Ashok Kumar Apat,
Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
01. 10.07.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CRLMP has been filed with the prayer to direct the Opp. Party No.4 to register FIR on the basis of the written information submitted by the Petitioner under Annexure-1 which is dated 03.04.2026.
2. Mr. R.R. Das, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the land of the Petitioner was demarcated on 07.11.2025 by the Tahasildar, pursuant to order dated 25.09.2025 passed in WPC No. 27614 of 2025, in presence of boundary tenants. On 23.03.2026, while the Petitioner was raising boundary construction over her land by engaging labourers, the accused persons abused the workers in filthy language and threatened them with dire consequences and obstructed the construction work. So the petitioner submitted a written complaint on 25.03.2026 before the IIC, Nandankanan Police Station. Even though the complaint disclosed commission of cognizable offences, the IIC, Nandankanan Police Station did not register any case for which written representation was submitted to the DCP, Bhubaneswar by speed post on 03.04.2026. Even though more than three months have elapsed in the meanwhile neither any case has been registered nor any inquiry conducted, for which the CRLMP was filed.
3. After hearing learned counsel for the Petitioner, in view of the nature of allegations, and the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Sudhir Bhaskarrao Tambe v. Hemant Yashwant Dhage (2016)6 SCC 277 , the CRLMP is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioner to avail the alternative remedy which is available to her for redressal of her grievance.
4. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge Madhusmita Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 10-Jul-2026 20:49:58 Signature Not Verified