Orissa High Court
CRLMP/834/2026 of SANDIP KUMAR PRASAD Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 10 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 834 of 2026 Sandip Kumar Prasad …. Petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Sarangi, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha, Represented by its Secretary, Deptt. of Home, Bhubaneswar 2. Superintendent of Police, Rourkela 3. Inspector In-charge,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 834 of 2026
Sandip Kumar Prasad
….
Petitioner
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sarangi, Advocate
-versus-
1. State of Odisha, Represented by its
Secretary,
Deptt.
of
Home,
Bhubaneswar
2. Superintendent of Police, Rourkela
3. Inspector In-charge, Tangarpali
Police Station
4. Priti Kumari
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 10.07.2026
(Through Hybrid Mode)
04.
1. This CRLMP has been filed with the following prayer:- “In view of the foregoing facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to:
1. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction directing the Opp. party No. 3-Tangarpali Police Station - to register an FIR dt 18.06.2026 vied Annexure 1 on the basis of the Petitioner's complaint and conduct a proper and fair investigation and give police protection;
2. Issue appropriate directions to the Opp. party No. 2 Deputy Commissioner of Police to monitor the investigation and ensure compliance with the law;
3. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
4. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound, over pray.”
2. The prayer is defective and has not been drafted properly.
3. I am not inclined to issue any direction in view of the availability of alternative remedy.
4. In view of the nature of allegations and the availability of alternative remedy, the CRLMP is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioner to avail the alternative remedy.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 10-Jul-2026 21:25:45 Signature Not Verified