Orissa High Court
WP(C)/10119/2026 of MALI RANA Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 9 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) NO.10119 OF 2026 Mali Rana & another …. Petitioners Mr. Gopal Chandra Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Manmaya Kumar Dash, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO.10119 OF 2026
Mali Rana & another
….
Petitioners
Mr. Gopal Chandra Das, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Manmaya Kumar Dash,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 09.07.2026
02.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. The Petitioners have filed this writ petition with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue notice to the opposite parties and after hearing the parties, issue appropriate writ(s)/ direction(s) directing the Opp. Parties to adjudicate, sanction and disburse the compensation amount in connection to the petition u/s. 28-A of the L.A. Act under Annexure - 3 in L.A. Case No. 09 of 2012 in terms of the judgment dated 01.10.2019 passed in LAR No.39 of 2019 and judgment dated 23.09.2019 passed in LAR No.40 of 2019 by the court of learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Bhawanipatna within a stipulated time period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court; And any other order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper; And for this act of kindness the petitioners as on duty bound ever pray.”
3. In course of hearing, Mr. Das, learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that inadvertently, a document (Annexure-3) has been enclosed to the writ petition, which does not relate to the Petitioners. In view of the inadvertent mistake, errors crept in the averments made in the writ petition.
3.1. Hence, he seeks for withdrawal of the writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
4. Mr. Dash, learned Additional Standing Counsel does not have any objection to such prayer.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the Petitioners to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars within one month hence.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
Mona Digitally Signed Signed by: MONALISA SWAIN Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 10-Jul-2026 16:11:43 Signature Not Verified