Orissa High Court
RPFAM/94/2023 of SANJIB PRADHAN Vs RASHMITA PRADHAN on 8 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.94 of 2023 Sanjib Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate -versus- Rashmita Pradhan …. Opp. Party CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 08.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 03. 1. Pursuant to the order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.94 of 2023
Sanjib Pradhan
….
Petitioner
Mr. B. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
Rashmita Pradhan
….
Opp. Party
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
No.
ORDER
08.07.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
03.
1. Pursuant to the order dated 29.06.2026 the matter is listed indicating in the cause list that the matter shall be disposed of.
2. The matter was presented before this Court on 17.03.2023, thereafter, it is listed today after three years and two months for ‘Fresh Admission’ and is mentioned by the learned counsel for the Petitioner stating that the Petitioner wants to withdraw the petition with liberty to file it again.
3. He is apprised of the position in law that after filing of the revision application it cannot be withdrawn after a period of more than three years with liberty to file it again.
4. It is further submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner remains incommunicado despite all amit the efforts of the learned counsel.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to personal difficulty he is appearing in VC. He has also made efforts to contact the petitioner over phone without any result.
5. Apparently, after presenting the petition before this Court on 17.03.2023 for the last more than three years the petitioner has not taken any interest in prosecuting the matter.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner files Memo of date which is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated.
7. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 09-Jul-2026 19:18:47 Signature Not Verified