Orissa High Court
CMAPL/848/2023 of PRAHALLAD KUMAR DIXIT Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 7 July 2026
of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMAPL No.848 OF 2023 Prahallad Kumar Dixit …. Petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Panigrahi, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa and another …. Opp. Parties Mrs. Jyoshnamayee Sahoo, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CMAPL No.848 OF 2023
Prahallad Kumar Dixit
….
Petitioner
Mr. Ashok Kumar Panigrahi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and another
…. Opp. Parties
Mrs. Jyoshnamayee Sahoo,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 07.07.2026
04. I.A. No.225 of 2025
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 184 days in filing of the CMAPL.
3. Notice on Opposite Party No.2 is sufficient, but none appears on its behalf at the time of call. Further, no objection has been filed by the State -Opposite Party No.1.
4. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, delay of 184 days in filing the CMAPL is condoned.
5. Accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of.
Judge
(S.K. Mishra) Judge Digitally Signed Signed by: SASHIKANT PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 07-Jul-2026 19:54:17 Signature Not Verified
05. CMAPL No.848 of 2023
1. This CMAPL has been filed with a prayer to restore the CMAPL No.506 of 2022 arising out of W.P.(C) No.14850 of 2022. A further prayer is made in the CMAPL to restore W.P.(C) No.14850 of 2022.
2. Mrs. Sahoo, learned Additional Standing Counsel for Opposite Party No.1 objects to the prayer for restoration of the writ Petition submitting that no ground is made out for restoration of the writ petition. She further submits that the Petitioner is thoroughly negligent in pursuing the writ petition and CMAPLs. Thus, no leniency should be shown to the Petitioner by providing another opportunity of hearing in the writ petition.
3. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, this Court restores the W.P.(C) No.14850 of 2022 to file.
4. Accordingly, the CMAPL is disposed of.
Judge
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge
06. W.P.(C) No.14850 of 2022
1. In view of order of even date passed in CMAPL No.848 of 2023, the writ petition is restored to file.
2. Put up this matter on 11th August, 2026.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(S.K. Mishra)
Judge Sashikant