Orissa High Court
CRLMP/815/2026 of CHINMAY SENAPATI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 6 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.815 of 2026 Chinmay Senapati …. Petitioner Mr. Satyajit Routray, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha, represented through Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Bhubaneswar 2. Superintendent of Police, Nayagarh 3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No.815 of 2026
Chinmay Senapati
….
Petitioner
Mr. Satyajit Routray, Advocate
-versus-
1. State of Odisha, represented
through Additional Chief
Secretary, Home Department,
Bhubaneswar
2. Superintendent of Police,
Nayagarh
3. Inspector-In-Charge, Sarankul
Police Station, Nayagarh
4. Dr. Tapas Ranjan Senapati,
Superintendent/Block Public
Health Officer, CHC, Sarankul
Dist. Nayagarh
….
Opposite Parties
Mr. Saroj Kumar Rout,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.07.2026
01. (Through Hybrid Mode)
1. This CRLMP has been filed for a direction to Opposite Parties No.2 and 3 to register the written complaint dated 23.02.2026 and to take action against the Opposite Party No.4 on basis of the FIR under Annexure-1 as well as realize Rs.3,00,000/- which has been taken by Opposite Party No.4.
2. The name of Mr. Satyajit Routray has not been mentioned on top of the brief or in the cause list. This is due to the oversight of the Registry as his name is mentioned in the Vakalatnama and he has signed the Vakalatnama.
3. The allegations of the Petitioner is that the father of the Petitioner had paid Rs.3 lakhs to the Opposite Party No.4 for issuing an appointment order to the Petitioner as an attendant in the Community Health Centre, Sarankul. But as he was not given any pay nor the amount returned to him, he had complained to the CDMO, Nayagarh and also lodged FIR at the Sarankul Police Station on 23.02.2026. But no case was registered, representation / petition was sent to the Opposite Party No.2-S.P., Nayagarh by speed post on 09.03.2026, but to no avail, hence this CRLMP.
4. In view of the allegation that money was paid to the Opposite Party No.4 - Dr. Tapas Ranjan Senapati, for securing a job, I do not consider this to be a fit case to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue any direction.
5. The CRLMP is disposed of.
6. The Petitioner is at liberty to avail of the alternative remedy which is available to him.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge RKS Digitally Signed Signed by: RANJAN KUMAR SETHI Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 07-Jul-2026 20:56:00 Signature Not Verified