Orissa High Court
WP(C)/18918/2026 of M/S SOURAT DAS (TRADE NAME THE HEALTH MART), BHUBANESWAR Vs SUPERINTENDENT OF GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, BHUBANESWAR VII RANGE, BHUBANESWAR on 6 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18918 of 2026 M/s. Sourat Das, Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner Mr. Ramesh Chandra Jena, Advocate -versus- Superintendent of GST & Central Excise, Bhubaneswar VII Range, Bhubaneswar …. Opposite Party Mr. Umesh Chandra Sahoo, Jr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18918 of 2026
M/s. Sourat Das, Bhubaneswar
….
Petitioner
Mr. Ramesh Chandra Jena, Advocate
-versus-
Superintendent of GST & Central
Excise, Bhubaneswar VII Range,
Bhubaneswar
….
Opposite Party
Mr. Umesh Chandra Sahoo, Jr. Standing Counsel, CGST
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
06.07.2026
01.
1. Learned counsel appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, under challenge is show cause notice dated 4th February, 2026 followed by order dated 11th March, 2026 cancelling his client’s registration under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid for the return form of his client to be accepted by the Department. He relies on order dated 16th November, 2022 of coordinate Bench in W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022 (M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. The Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha, Cuttack and others). He submits, his client’s claim to relief including prayer for condonation of delay is covered by said order.
2. Mr. Umesh Chandra Sahoo, learned Jr. Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the opposite party-Department.
3. We reproduce below paragraph-2 from said order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises (supra).
"2. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law."
Likewise direction is made in this writ petition. Petitioner gets the relief in the interest of revenue.
4. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Harish Tandon)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
M. Panda Digitally Signed Signed by: MRUTYUNJAYA PANDA
Reason:
Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 08-Jul-2026 14:42:27 Signature Not Verified