Orissa High Court
WPC(OAC)/3172/2012 of RAMA CHANDRA NAIK Vs STATE OF ORISSA on 6 July 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC(OAC) No. 3172 of 2012 Rama Chandra Naik …. Petitioner Mr. Biswabihari Mohanty, Advocate -versus- 1.State of Orissa 2.Director, Elementary Education, Orissa 3.District Inspector of School, Athagarh …. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No. 3172 of 2012
Rama Chandra Naik
….
Petitioner
Mr. Biswabihari Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
1.State of Orissa
2.Director, Elementary Education,
Orissa
3.District Inspector of School,
Athagarh
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
05. 06.07.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 29.08.2012 and 03.09.2012 and the gradation list of level-V teachers prepared in compliance of the impugned order and to issue a direction to the respondents to allow the applicant to continue as head master in terms of order of promotion dated 22.07.2005 with all consequential financial and service benefits.
2. On 12.07.2022, after receiving the counter affidavit, the learned counsel for the Petitioner had prayed for time to obtain instructions and the matter had been directed to be listed on 11.08.2022. However, the matter was not listed on 11.08.2022 and has been listed today after almost four years.
3. Today, Mr. Biswabihari Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner files a memo stating that the matter has become infructuous. The contents of the memo which are reproduced are confusing: “That the above matter today listed on dated 06.07.2026(weekly SI No. 33) in meantime Hon’ble Court direction to infructuous and disposed of.”
4. But in view of the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the matter has become infructuous, the WPC(OAC) is dismissed.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Subhalaxmi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 06-Jul-2026 20:54:08 Signature Not Verified