Orissa High Court
RPFAM/23/2021 of SASHIKANTA SAHU Vs MADHUSMITA NAYAK @ SAHU on 30 June 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.23 of 2021 Sashikanta Sahu …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Pattnayak, Advocate -versus- Madhusmita Nayak @ Sahu & another …. Opp. Parties CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 30.06.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.23 of 2021
Sashikanta Sahu
….
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Pattnayak, Advocate
-versus-
Madhusmita Nayak @ Sahu &
another
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
No.
ORDER
30.06.2026 (Hybrid Mode)
06.
1. The Revision Application was presented before this Court on 16.03.2021. As there were defects in filing, it was adjourned on 21.11.2025 granting time to remove of defects. On 06.03.2026 further time was granted for removal of defects.
On 09.04.2026 the following order was passed: “1. The matter was presented before this Court on 16.03.2021. After five years of presentation, adjournment is sought for by the learned counsel for the Petitioner by making a mention. Earlier the matter was listed on 21.11.2025, 06.03.2026 & 13.03.2026 and was adjourned.
2. To grant further opportunity, list for Fresh Admission in the week commencing 04.05.2026.”
On 04.05.2026 the following order was passed: “1. The matter is listed for fresh admission amit and is mentioned at the beginning of the day‟s proceeding seeking adjournment. The matter has been adjourned earlier on four occasions.
2. To grant further opportunity to the petitioner, list for „Fresh Admission‟ in the week commencing 29.06.2026.”
2. Today the matter having been listed for ‘Fresh Admission’ memo of date is filed which states thus:
“It is submitted that the case may kindly be permitted to withdraw of this case as per no instruction the Client/Petitioner.
Hence the memo is filed” (sic)
The memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated.
3. In view of the above, the Petition stands disposed of.
4. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the learned Judge, Family Court, Baleshwar to be kept in the records of C.R.P. No.252 of 2010 disposed of by judgment dated 23.03.2020 arising out of Crl. Misc. Case No.187 of 2008. Registry to do the needful.
(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo)
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: AMIT KUMAR MOHANTY Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 03-Jul-2026 10:31:43 Signature Not Verified