Orissa High Court
WP(C)/18464/2026 of RABINDRA NATH SWAIN Vs A.O., ZONAL OFFICER, INDIAN BANK, CUTTACK on 30 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18464 of 2026 Rabindra Nath Swain …. Petitioner Mr. G. K. Parida, Advocate -versus- Authorized Officer, Indian Bank, Cuttack & another …. Opp. Parties Mr. K.C. Kar, G.A. Mr. Tuna Sahu, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18464 of 2026
Rabindra Nath Swain
….
Petitioner
Mr. G. K. Parida, Advocate
-versus-
Authorized Officer, Indian
Bank, Cuttack & another
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. K.C. Kar, G.A.
Mr. Tuna Sahu, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
30.06.2026
02. The period prescribed for making payment, in terms of order dated 19.06.2026, is extended by two weeks. Petitioner- borrower is knocking at the doors of this Court with the following prayer:
“The petitioner, therefore, prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, issue RULE NISI, calling upon the Opp. Party to show cause as to why the notice dt. 30/05/2026 under Annexure- 1 shall not be quashed; And if the Opp. Party fails to show cause or shows insufficient cause, the said Rule be made absolute…;
2. Learned Panel Counsel appearing for the Bank points out that the auction of the security property having been held on 19.06.2026, the buyer has already deposited 25% of the auction money and will deposit the remainder within the prescribed period under Rule 9(4) of the Extended Rules. He also submits that the Petitioner has got an alternate remedy under Section 17 of the
2002 Act and therefore, in the absence of extra ordinary circumstances, interference of the Writ Court is unwarranted. We agree.
In the above circumstances, Petition is disposed off reserving liberty to the Petitioner to work out his remedy elsewhere as indicated above. In that connection, all contentions are kept open.
Web copy of this order to be acted upon by all concerned.
(Krishna S. Dixit)
Judge
(Chittaranjan Dash)
Judge
Bijay/Sarbani Digitally Signed Signed by: SARBANI DASH Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 01-Jul-2026 16:45:17 Signature Not Verified