Orissa High Court
CRLMP/1745/2021 of ARJUN BEHERA Vs JEMAMANI BEHERA on 30 June 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 1745 of 2021 Arjun Behera … Petitioner Mr. Daitari Pradhan, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Gokha Behera, Advocate -versus- Jemamani Behera and Another … Opp. Parties RPFAM No. 78 of 2016 Arjun Behera … Petitioner Mr. Daitari
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 1745 of 2021
Arjun Behera
…
Petitioner
Mr. Daitari Pradhan, Advocate
On behalf of Mr. Gokha Behera, Advocate
-versus-
Jemamani Behera and Another
… Opp. Parties
RPFAM No. 78 of 2016
Arjun Behera
…
Petitioner
Mr. Daitari Pradhan, Advocate
On behalf of Mr. Gokha Behera, Advocate
-versus-
Jemamani Behera and Another
… Opp. Parties
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
30.06.2026
11. (Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CRLMP has been filed for directing the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why Crl. P. No. 68 of 2018 filed under Section 128 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 18 of the Family Court Act shall not be quashed.
2. A memo signed by Mr. Gokha Behera, learned counsel for the Petitioner is submitted by Mr. Daitari Pradhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Gokha Behera stating that the Petitioner in CRLMP No. 1745 of 2021 may be permitted puspa to withdraw the CRLMP as it has become infructuous. The memo filed for withdrawal is taken on record.
3. Mr. Daitari Pradhan, learned counsel states that the CRLMP has been rendered infructuous for which it may be permitted to be withdrawn.
4. In view of the submission and the memo, the CRLMP is dismissed as infructuous.
5. It is stated by Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Gokha Behera that RPFAM No. 78 of 2016 which has been tagged to this Court may be sent for mediation.
6. As RPFAM No. 78 of 2016 is not in the assignment of this Court, such prayer should be made before the assigned Bench.
7. Hence, RPFAM No. 78 of 2016 be delinked from this case and listed before the assigned Bench.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: PUSPANJALI MOHAPATRA Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 30-Jun-2026 19:27:42 Signature Not Verified