Orissa High Court
CRLMP/189/2021 of SURAJ SAHU Vs RAMRATI SAHU @ RAMABATI SAHU on 29 June 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No.189 of 2021 1.Suraj Sahu 2.Smt. Janaki Sahu …. Petitioners Mr. Sudipta Panda, Advocate on behalf of Mr. D. Panda, Advocate -versus- 1. Ramrati Sahu @ Ramabati Sahu 2. Laxmi Gupta 3. Manju Sahu 4. State of Odisha …. Opp. Parties Mr.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No.189 of 2021
1.Suraj Sahu
2.Smt. Janaki Sahu
….
Petitioners
Mr. Sudipta Panda, Advocate
on behalf of Mr. D. Panda, Advocate
-versus-
1. Ramrati Sahu @ Ramabati Sahu
2. Laxmi Gupta
3. Manju Sahu
4. State of Odisha
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Swapnil Roy,
Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No.
07. 29.06.2026
(Through hybrid Mode)
1. This CRLMP had been filed for quashing the proceedings for maintenance initiated against the Peititoner under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 before the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate Sadar, Sambalpur in Case No. 01 of 2019 and award of maintenance made against them vide Annexure-1 and Annexure-1/1 as well as the Execution Proceedings in Execution Misc. Case No. 01 of 2021.
2. On 15.05.2026, when the matter was taken up as no counsel appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, the matter had been adjourned to today.
3. Mr. S. Panda, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that during pendency of the CRLMP, the victim-Opposite Party No. 1 has expired. Hence, the Petitioners do not want to proceed with this CRLMP. He files a withdrawal memo signed by Mr. D. Panda, learned counsel for the Petitioner. It shall be scanned and placed in the digital record.
4. Mr. Swapnil Roy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party No. 1 to 3 submits that he does not have any instructions regarding death of Opposite Party No.1.
5. Complaint in this case had been filed by Petitioners No. 2 and 3.
6. But as the Petitioners do not want to proceed with this CRLMP, this CRLMP is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Subhalaxmi
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHALAXMI PRIYADARSHANI SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 30-Jun-2026 11:23:25 Signature Not Verified