Orissa High Court
CRLMP/728/2026 of KEDAR CHANDRA SARANGI Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 23 June 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 728 of 2026 Kedar Chandra Sarangi …. Petitioner Mr. M.S. Hasan, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha, represented by Secretary Home Department, Bhubaneswar 2. Superintendent of Police, Cuttack 3. Inspector-in-charge of Cantonment Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No. 728 of 2026
Kedar Chandra Sarangi
….
Petitioner
Mr. M.S. Hasan, Advocate
-versus-
1. State of Odisha, represented by
Secretary
Home
Department,
Bhubaneswar
2. Superintendent of Police, Cuttack
3. Inspector-in-charge of Cantonment
Police Station, Cuttack
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Ashok Kumar Apat,
Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Order No. 23.06.2026
(Through Hybrid Mode)
01.
1. This CRLMP has been filed with the following prayer:- “In the above facts and circumstances, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the above CRLMP and issue notice to the opp.parties and your lordship may direct to the O.P. No.2 and 3 to register the Written report as F.I.R. dated 23.09.2025 and 8.10.2025 and take action against the accused persons who were wandering here and there;
Pass any other writ/writs and order
(s) /direction(s) that your Lordship may deem fit and proper in the interest of Justice, equity and good conscience;
And for which act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound, ever pray.”
2. After hearing Mr. M.S. Hasan, learned counsel for the Petitioner and perusing the CRLMP and annextures, I do not consider this to be a fit case to exercise discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue any direction to the Opposite Parties No. 2 and 3.
3. The CRLMP is accordingly dismissed.
4. Mr. M.S. Hasan, learned counsel for the Petitioner then submits that the Petitioner shall approach the learned Magistrate under Section 175(3) of BNSS.
5. Since this recourse is available to him under law, he can always do so.
6. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2026 19:18:51 Signature Not Verified