Orissa High Court

CRLMP/576/2026 of SUMITRA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 23 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 576 of 2026 Sumitra Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. Pradipta Kumar Sahoo, Advocate -versus- 1. Sate of Odisha, Represented through its Secretary, Home Department, Bhubaneswar 2. Superintendent of Police, Puri 3. The I.I.C., Brahamagiri Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No. 576 of 2026

Sumitra Sahoo

….

Petitioner

Mr. Pradipta Kumar Sahoo, Advocate

-versus-

1. Sate of Odisha, Represented through

its

Secretary,

Home

Department,

Bhubaneswar

2. Superintendent of Police, Puri

3. The I.I.C., Brahamagiri Police

Station, Brahamagiri

4. Anirudha Pradhan

5. Manjulata Sahoo

6. Akash Kumar Pradhan

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Amitabh Pradhan,

Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 23.06.2026

(Through Hybrid Mode)

03.

1. This CRLMP has been filed for a direction to the Opposite Parties No. 2 and 3 to register FIR on the basis of the written complaints dated 12.11.2025 and 23.12.2025 submitted by the Petitioner at the Police Station and sent to the S.P. on 09.03.2026 through speed post. Till date as no action has been taken by the I.I.C., Brahmagiri Police Station, this CRLMP has been filed.

2. Operative portion of the order passed on 19.05.2026 is extracted below:- “Mr. Amitabh Pradhan, leamed Additional Standing Counsel submits that instructions have not been received in the case for which a short adjournment may be granted.”

3. Mr. Pradhan, learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that in spite of letter being sent to the I.I.C., Brahmagiri Police Station, no instructions have been received.

4. Mr. Pradipta Kumar Sahoo, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the DW and conditional NBW issued against the Opposite Party No. 6 – Akash Kumar Pradhan has been executed in the meanwhile. He also submits that during pendency of this CRLMP, Brahmagiri P.S. Case No. 230 of 2026 has been registered against Opposite Party No.4, but Opposite Party No.5 has not been arrayed as an accused.

5. As a case has already been registered and investigation must have commenced, the CRLMP is disposed of directing the I.O. in the case to proceed with the investigation in accordance with law and submit final form against the persons against whom allegations and materials are found during investigation.

6. But copy of this order be communicated to the Director General of Police, so that he is aware of the conduct of the I.I.C., Brahmagiri Police Station.

7. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 24-Jun-2026 19:18:51 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead