Orissa High Court

CRLMP/676/2026 of MAKAR SINGH Vs STATE OF ODISHA on 22 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 676 of 2026 Makar Singh …. Petitioner None -versus- 1. State of Odisha, represented through Secretary, Home Department, Bhubaneswar 2. Superintendent of Police, Kendrapara 3. I.I.C., Marshaghai Police Station …. Opp. Parties Mr.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No. 676 of 2026

Makar Singh

….

Petitioner

None

-versus-

1. State of Odisha, represented through

Secretary,

Home

Department,

Bhubaneswar

2.

Superintendent

of

Police,

Kendrapara

3. I.I.C., Marshaghai Police Station

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Ashok Kumar Apat,

Additional Government Advocate

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Order No. 22.06.2026

(Through Hybrid Mode)

01.

1. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called in the first hour (the matter was listed at Sl. No.2) so it was passed over. When the matter is called after recess, none appears on behalf of the Petitioner.

2. This CRLMP has been filed with a prayer to direct the Opposite Party No.3 to take legal action and register the case under Section 109 of BNS, 2023.

3. From a perusal of Annexure-1, the copy of the FIR in Marsaghai P.S. Case No. 84 of 2026, it is apparent that it has been registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 296, 308(4), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS against one Papu Behera and others.

4. Copy of the prescription of the Petitioner dated 24.02.2026 of the DHH, Kendrapara has been annexed as Annexure-2 which indicates that he has sustained a stitched injury on the left CAC.

5. It is the settled position of law that the FIR is not the encyclopedia of the case. If during investigation the Investigating Officer finds materials which make out an offence under Section 109 of BNS against the accused persons, he/she is duty bound to include the said offence and proceed with the investigation of the same and include the offence in the final form.

6. If the Petitioner is in any way aggrieved by the result of the investigation, he is at liberty to challenge the same in the appropriate forum.

7. With this observation, the CRLMP is disposed of.

8. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(Savitri Ratho)

Judge

Sukanta Digitally Signed Signed by: SUKANTA KUMAR BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 22-Jun-2026 19:47:02 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead