Orissa High Court
WP(C)/18132/2026 of SK.CHAND Vs THE AUTHORISED OFFICER-CUM-REGIONAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, CUTTACK on 22 June 2026
of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.18132 of 2026 Mr. SK. Chand …. Petitioner Mr. A . Nayak, Advocate -Versus- The Authorised Officer-cum-Regional Manager, Canara Bank, Cuttack & Others …. Opp. Parties CORAM: JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18132 of 2026
Mr. SK. Chand
….
Petitioner
Mr. A. Nayak, Advocate
-Versus-
The Authorised Officer-cum-Regional
Manager, Canara Bank, Cuttack &
Others
….
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT
JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
01.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
22.06.2026
Petition by the borrower has the following prayer column: “It is therefore prayed that your lordship would graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition, call for report and issue RULE NISI calling upon the opposite parties particularly Opp.Party No.l & 2 to show cause as to why the Possession notice dtd. 06.06.2026 and Sale Notice dtd. 16.01.2026 for demanding of Rs.46,28133/- as on 13.02.2026 by creating 3rd party interest in respect of Equitable Mortgage of Land and Building over Khata No- 540/123,Plot No-570/1141 of an.Area Ac 0.040Dec.,Mauza Chandpur, SRO Pattamundei, Tahasil/Dist-Kendrapada would not be set aside; And further direct to consider the representation dtd.4.7.2025 of the petitioner for reschedule of the business loan or accept the proposal for OTS scheme; And pass such other writ(s) order(s) direction(s) may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity; And for which act of your kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
2. The grievance sought to be worked out in the petition can be worked out before the DRT, in accordance with law, no extraordinary circumstances having been shown for our interference.
In view of the above, petition is accordingly disposed off preserving liberty. All contentions are kept open. Registry to send a copy of this order to all OPs by speed post, immediately.
(Krishna S. Dixit) Judge
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
Madhusmita
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA MALLICK Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 23-Jun-2026 13:30:06 Signature Not Verified